Block 2 Case Study
STP & The Buying Committee
Internal Strategy Meeting · Dramatised Case Study
"Who's Cooking?"
A debate on segmentation, targeting, and the invisible people in every B2B buying decision
Context — What Is a Cloud Kitchen?

A cloud kitchen — also called a ghost kitchen or dark kitchen — is a professional, fully-equipped commercial kitchen rented by food entrepreneurs to cook exclusively for delivery orders. There is no dine-in, no storefront, no front-of-house staff. The entire business runs through delivery platforms like Zomato, Swiggy, or direct WhatsApp ordering.

CloudNest operates as a coworking cloud kitchen — multiple food businesses share the same licensed, compliant, commercial-grade facility, each paying for the time and space they need. Think of it like a WeWork, but with industrial burners, cold storage, and a health certificate on the wall. Existing restaurants can also use CloudNest to test a delivery-only sub-brand or expand to a new neighbourhood — without signing a new lease or risking their main brand.

24 kitchen slots
2 city locations
40% occupancy
3 months to prove viability
VR
Vikram Rao
Director of Marketing — focused on revenue stability and longer-term positioning
MS
Meera Shah
Marketing Manager — focused on acquisition volume and cost-efficiency
The Conversation
Vikram
Alright Meera, I need a targeting decision by end of this week. Twenty-four slots, 40% occupancy. So — who are we going after?
Meera
I've been looking at our inbound data. The strongest organic interest is coming from aspiring chefs — young, college-educated, food-obsessed. They want to launch something without signing a three-year lease. Low barrier, high motivation.
Vikram
Walk me through the numbers. Booking length? Ticket size?
Meera
Honestly? Short. Two to four months — they experiment, test a few dishes on Zomato, some scale, most don't. But they're incredibly easy to reach. Instagram, YouTube food content, food blogger communities. Cost of acquisition is low and they generate organic buzz.
Vikram
So high volume, high churn, low lifetime value. We'd be filling slots and losing them every quarter. That's a treadmill. What about the home cook segment?
Meera
That's the one I'm most excited about. People running tiffin services, meal prep businesses, selling on WhatsApp — genuinely underserved, genuinely motivated. No commercial kitchen, no compliant setup, no scale. We solve all three problems in one go.
Vikram
Except it's rarely a clean individual decision. The person cooking might be fully convinced — but they still need to sort out financing. When you're talking about a recurring monthly cost, most people are factoring in a partner's opinion, or a parent's comfort level. And we're not just competing with other cloud kitchens — we're competing with "but we have a perfectly good kitchen at home."
Meera
True, and it cuts both ways — it's not a gender thing. We've seen it equally with men who want to start a cloud kitchen brand. Just as likely to need their partner's buy-in on the monthly expense, or to be relying on family for the first few months of funding. The person cooking is committed. The person financing has doubts. Those are two different conversations we need to be having simultaneously.
Vikram
And sometimes it's even more complicated than that. We had a lead last month — Fatima and Divya, two friends going in together. Fatima wanted to go full-time, Divya wanted to test it on weekends. Equal partners, equal say, completely different risk appetite.
Meera
They've been "almost ready" for six weeks. Last I heard they're still debating it in their WhatsApp group.
Vikram
Two decision-makers, no hierarchy, no deadline. Which is exactly why I keep gravitating toward small restaurants. The owner has already run a business. They're not asking "is this a good idea?" — they're asking "does this work for my margins?"
Meera
Stronger buyer, but slower sale. The owner sends their manager to check it out first. The manager likes it but can't commit. Then the owner wants a trial. Then the accountant flags the contract. That's four conversations before a signature, minimum.
Vikram
Still manageable. But here's the segment I want to put on the table that we've been avoiding — large restaurant chains. Established brands, multiple outlets, strong balance sheets. They're curious about cloud kitchens but won't risk their main brand on a delivery experiment. What if we position CloudNest as the safe sandbox?
Meera
That's actually interesting. They run a delivery-only sub-brand out of our kitchen — completely separate from their main restaurant, no reputational risk if it doesn't work. But you're talking to a business development manager, a finance head, possibly the COO. How many of those conversations can we realistically run at once?
Vikram
Not many. But the deal size is substantial and the tenure could be six to twelve months while they pilot. And there's a fifth segment — ghost kitchen operators. Already running delivery-only brands, want to expand to a second location without capital expenditure.
Meera
Highest LTV by far. But they know exactly what they want, they'll negotiate hard on pricing, and the moment they hit the volume that justifies their own space — they're gone. There's no loyalty play there.
Vikram
So — five segments. We cannot go after all of them with one message, one channel, and one campaign budget.
Meera
So here's the real question. Do we go after the segment that fills our slots fastest in the next 90 days — or the segment that builds our credibility for the next three years?
Vikram
Those aren't the same answer.
Meera
No. They really aren't. So which is it?
— The meeting ends without a decision. —